Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Scholar Practitioners

 

It is our responsibility as an early childhood professional to work to strengthen the quality of early learning programs. High-quality early care and education has a positive impact on school readiness, school success, and long-term social and economic outcomes. Currently there is a national movement to support early educators in implementing high-quality practices, as teacher quality is the most important factor affecting child outcomes. State-wide Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) hold promise for offering a systemic, coordinated approach to improving quality (QRIS, n.d).  Educators need to be open to be a part of these programs and by taking in the information and make changes where they are needed.  

In my own experience I have seen barriers when our program decided to go with QRIS because there were changes that needed to happen to make our program meet the standards.  I think educating the staff members to help them understand how being a part of quality improvement can benefit the system as a whole.  When it comes to program evaluations it is essential everyone is on the same page and understands exactly what needs to be done and why.

I believe you can minimize the barrier by having very open communication and meeting often as a group to discuss the results of an evaluation and how change can happen to raise the quality of the program to the next level.

Reference

Homepage: QRIS National Learning Network |. (n.d.). Retrieved August 04, 2020, from                          https://qrisnetwork.org/


Monday, June 8, 2020

Program Evaluation

In my current position as a Program Area Supervisor in Head Start I want to use this course to impact my knowledge on program evaluation.  I am a part of self-assessment each year and I participate in management meetings about different aspects we are going to focus on that have bubbled up over the year. I am excited to be a part of a community with others who have information about program evaluation and how it has supported growth in their own program.  I also would like to know the role program evaluation plays with each of the other early childhood educators in this learning community.  In my past experiences I have found the most growth comes from a group of people who have open minds and are willing to work together for the best outcomes of the program as a whole.  I feel I am lucky to have this in my current work situation and everyone is working together to support the program and do their part.  I am currently impacted by the process of evaluating program quality because I have to be the one out in the classrooms making sure the programs are implementing the changes and things are running smoothly.  We need to serve the children and families to the best of our ability and have a high quality early childhood program.

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Assistive Technology

Assistive Technology 
  • Assistive technology can help a child to participate more actively in family, school and community activities. play successfully with toys and other children. communicate his or her needs and ideas.

  • Assistive devices and services can be of great value in providing infants and young children with disabilities opportunities to learn and interact with their environment in ways that might not otherwise be possible.

Assistive technology can help a child to:
  • participate more actively in family, school and community activities

  • play successfully with toys and other children

  • communicate his or her needs and ideas

  • make choices

  • move independently

Sensory
  • Sensory tools can help increase or decrease stimulation to help a child feel more comfortable and secure in their environment. Common examples include:

  • Noise-blocking headphones to mute sounds in noisy or over-stimulating environments

  • Fidgets, small items that a child can hold, provide extra stimulation needed to help children focus

  • Weighted blankets or toys that provide slight pressure on the body and help some children feel more calm and focused

Communication
  • Between birth and age 5, a child’s vocabulary (both words they understand and words they can use) grows at a rapid rate. For children who struggle to communicate verbally, there are many different types of technology that can provide them with their own voice. Common examples include:

  • Apps for tablets, such as an iPad, that “speak” words a child selects on the screen

    • A laminated collection of words and corresponding symbols a child can point to and indicate their feelings, wants, and needs

    • A single message device, consisting of a simple button with a built-in speaker. It records a message (e.g., “I’m hungry”) and a child can press the button to activate the message for a parent or caregiver


Culturally Responsive
  • The user must always be the main focus.  Aspects of his or her native culture, language, beliefs, and customs as they relate to the person directly, and to the family or larger community in general, must be taken into account. We need to examine the users own philosophy and beliefs about inclusion and participation. To force individuals to acquire and try to use technology that they do not believe in or cannot accept will not work. Matching even the best, most complex, and most expensive high-tech AT with users who are culturally unprepared or unwilling to accept and use such devices will still result in AT failure. 


Reference
PACER Center - Champions for Children with Disabilities. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.pacer.org/

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Scenarios

Assessment provides educators, parents, and families with critical information about a child's development and growth. Assessmentcan: Provide a record of growth in all developmental areas: cognitive, physical/motor, language, social-emotional, and approaches to learning.

Kalani is a 4 year-old boy.  He moved from Hawaii six months ago.  He is very quiet and doesn't talk much at all and when he does it is one or two words.  He does not join in large group activities and likes to go off and sit by himself in the library area.   Kalani loves legos and building. He has a very hard time sharing and when he does not get his way he often gets very angry and yells, hits and screams.  He doesn't know how to hold a writing utensil and can’t write his name. He can identify the letters of the alphabet, colors and numbers by pointing at them.  The teacher would like to refer him for an evaluation for special education services but both the parents are very against this. They don’t want him to be labeled.  There are 20 children in his classroom. It is a half day and runs 3 ½ hours. His teacher is organized with very clear expectations for the students. She has a good relationship with the family but has to call them quite often to let them know about difficult behaviors in the classroom.  How would you get the parents on board with moving forward with the assessment? How could you get Kaliani interested in other activities in the classroom besides building and legos? 
Reference:

 Aiden is a 5 year old boy and is in kindergarten.  His home language is English. He has never been in school before and is an only child.  He lives with his single mother and his father has visitation every other weekend. Aiden gets distracted easily and has trouble focusing on a task.  He is unable to stay seated for extended periods of time and often gets up and walks around during teacher instruction. He often tells the teacher he is "bored' and moved onto another activity, he is not easily redirected and that often creates a power struggle.  His mom has told the teacher he has trouble completing homework and staying on task, so work often does not come back to the school. Aiden has difficulty organizing information or taking in new ways of doing things. When the teacher speaks to Aiden he seems not to listen and daydreams frequently.  He has trouble following two step directions.
What type of intervention assessment would you recommend for Aiden?
When early childhood educators use a comprehensive assessment system within an early childhood program it measures developmental growth with the children and screens for potential developmental or academic concerns.  Assessment also measures of the quality of the learning environment.
References
Early Childhood Assessment. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://resourcesforearlylearning.org/fm/early-childhood-assessment/

Monday, March 2, 2020

Oregon Early Learning


Oregon Early Learning and Kindergarten Guidelines aligned and expanded on Oregon's learning and development standards for children ages three through six in five domains. Approaches to learning, social-emotional development, language and communication.
Four best practices are essential for understanding and implementing the Early Learning and Kindergarten Guidelines: developmentally appropriate practice, culturally responsive practice, adverse childhood experiences and trauma–informed practice, and family engagement.
Oregon’s early learning and kindergarten guidelines were developed through an extensive, collaborative process in which the voices and values of a wide range of stakeholders were heard.  The Oregon Department of Education (ODE) and Oregon’s Early Learning Division (ELD) conducted a work group in April 2015 with two goals: aligning Oregon’s early learning and kindergarten standards for language, literacy, and math and developing new kindergarten standards in the domains of approaches to learning and social-emotional development.
These guidelines align with the NAEYC The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) defines developmentally appropriate practice as: An approach to teaching grounded in the research of how children develop and learn and in what is known about effective early education … developmentally appropriate practice involves teachers meeting young children where they are (by stage of development), both as individuals and as part of a group.” (National Association for the Education of Young Children, 2003)
NAEYC also identifies three core considerations of developmentally appropriate practice: knowledge of child development and learning, knowledge of children as individuals, and knowledge of children’s cultures. Oregon’s aligned early learning and kindergarten guidelines provide early educators a foundation for understanding age-typical developmental progressions while maintaining the flexibility for adults to meet each child where they are, regardless of age.
NBPTS Standard V: Assessing Children’s Development and Learning
Assessment is a process through which teachers learn about children’s social, cognitive, linguistic, physical, and emotional development by gathering and interpreting information. They ensure that assessment practices fairly and equitably focus on children’s emerging capabilities.  Accomplished early childhood teachers purposefully focus on young children’s development and their emerging subject matter knowledge. To develop a comprehensive picture of a child’s social relationships, modes of learning, use of language, family priorities and resources, strengths, and any possible concerns.
My suggestions for Early Learning in Oregon are to look at the current needs assessment to see where the needs are in the community moving forward.  Oregon received over $26 million in early learning funding and created a hub from all over the state with suggestions on how to allocate funds.  I participated in the Washington County hub and gave input on areas of need.  I think it is extremely important to look at the community and the barriers for early childcare to support the families in ways where it will help them and their children.
Questions:
How does this assessment help address inequities in our community?
Is the assessment consistent with accepted views of preschool curriculum?
How has the assessment been improved to address English Language Learners?

References
Center on Enhancing Early Learning Outcomes. (2016). State-by-state. Retrieved from http://ceelo.org/state-information/state-map/
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/CAPEexpand.pdf
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (2012). Early childhood generalist standards (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://boardcertifiedteachers.org/sites/default/files/EC-GEN.pdf